When it comes to people like Martin McGuinness, I'm willing to make an exception in terms of wishing an agonising, preferably cancerous death on someone.
May it happen soon. You should have been stillborn, you disgusting cunt.
How to Have Sex if You've Done it 10,000 Times
I wish there was something that could genuinely shock me. But there isn't.
In amongst all the stories of Fatty McMentalist throwing a drug induced hissy fit and bumbling about the studio like a drunken insomniac with a broken leg, I find this load of total and utter dog shit, courtesy of Manchester City Council.
It's a 47 page full colour guide explaining to members of our older generations how to insert a penis into one of those lady parts (complete with accompanying playtime tips and pre-requisite advice. Remember, you can't tell if someone has AIDS by looking at them. Mark in Eastenders, anyone? *ends sniggers*).
Having done their best to take the sexual shenanigans of teenagers out of parents' hands, it's now the turn of the olds to have the State take control.
Personally, I think it's just a fetish of theirs ;-)
In amongst all the stories of Fatty McMentalist throwing a drug induced hissy fit and bumbling about the studio like a drunken insomniac with a broken leg, I find this load of total and utter dog shit, courtesy of Manchester City Council.
It's a 47 page full colour guide explaining to members of our older generations how to insert a penis into one of those lady parts (complete with accompanying playtime tips and pre-requisite advice. Remember, you can't tell if someone has AIDS by looking at them. Mark in Eastenders, anyone? *ends sniggers*).
Having done their best to take the sexual shenanigans of teenagers out of parents' hands, it's now the turn of the olds to have the State take control.
Personally, I think it's just a fetish of theirs ;-)
Feature Creep
Always interesting to see Mr Snot's twisted interpretation of how to win over the Daily Mail readership. Sadly, the libertarian aspect of it all seems to have been lost on the senile old duffer. So how does Cyclops plan to deal with unmarried teenager mothers? He'll simply take them away.
Firstly, if he wants to reduce teenage pregnancies, waiting until they've fired out a kiddy or three to start "educating" them is perhaps leaving it a little late in the day (what of this sex education in schools, if I may ask?). Secondly, it's waste. Nobody is asking the government to squander tens/hundreds of millions of cash we don't have. I reckon half a billion isn't unrealistic. Thirdly, MORE state intervention isn't what the middle classes Labour so desperately want to appeal to are asking for - it's less state intervention (saying "we despise you, but will still provide you with a place to stay courtesy of someone else's wallet, kind of like how we did before" is rather confusing to someone possibly in the midst of post-natal depression).
Again. Simple pimple. If you want to stop someone abusing something, you simply take it away full stop for those people. But I suppose when you miss out on the opportunity to impose the righteousness of The State on these girls, it doesn't quite have the same ring to it. After all, who is going to teach them how to be good citizens and vote Labour otherwise? And I wonder what becomes of the absentee fathers in all this? Hardly "gender equality" is it? Teenage boys free to go around getting girls drunk on Bacardi Breeezers, inseminating them behind a bush in the park and then disappearing into the night knowing it won't be them getting sent to the gulag. Sounds like party time for the fellas, if you ask me.
I wonder what this could entail. What rules would these be? If the reason for them being here in solely that they've had a child and hoped to gain a free council house out of it, surely removing that option solves the problem. Evidently not. Are we looking at 8pm bedtimes and no talking between meals? And what are these parenting classes? Not all teenage mothers are bad mothers. And you can't help but worry about the unnecessary separation of mothers and babies over the breaking of a rule set in, what is in essence, a publicly funded boarding school with dodgy shower facilities.
The problem is that offering up an elaborate benefits package to people who haven't proved any kind of contribution is appealing to some (contribution could be any number of things: voluntary/charity work, helping out at a girl guides group, etc). Again, simply removing the generous benefits offered to those who put nothing physical or financial into the system would solve much of this and would get them thinking more about the "give" aspect of "give and take". (If my employers suggested I could get the same or better pay surfing the net all day, sooner or later I might think about taking them up on that. That's conclusive enough).
Despite the total epic fail of all this, I am heartened by the fact McSnot hasn't managed to follow through on any of the soundbites he's ever unleashed ("British jobs for British people"? "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"?).
Luckily, we've not got much more of this to come (Labour will be gone soon, and will tell us whilst in opposition - if they still exist - that they simply needed more time to implement this master plan), and whilst I don't expect the Tories to be much (if at all) better, I see the creep towards a total surveillance state being that tiny bit slower under their watch *.
I am almost smirking with astonishment at the total and deliberate misconprehension of the problem. It's the failure to understand that sometimes the removal of incentive, rather than the provision of after-the-event "deterrents" is the best way forward. And to me, this looks wholeheartedly backward, reminiscent of the places women giving birth out of wedlock were sent to 50 years ago.
Deliberate institutionalism. I wonder who will be next. Those who don't vote perhaps? (H.T. The Lone Voice for digging up the story).
* - May revise this later.
Teenage single mothers will be sent to live in supervised homes rather than given council houses, Mr Brown announced.
They will be taught how to bring up children under plans designed to reduce the number of teen pregnancies.
Firstly, if he wants to reduce teenage pregnancies, waiting until they've fired out a kiddy or three to start "educating" them is perhaps leaving it a little late in the day (what of this sex education in schools, if I may ask?). Secondly, it's waste. Nobody is asking the government to squander tens/hundreds of millions of cash we don't have. I reckon half a billion isn't unrealistic. Thirdly, MORE state intervention isn't what the middle classes Labour so desperately want to appeal to are asking for - it's less state intervention (saying "we despise you, but will still provide you with a place to stay courtesy of someone else's wallet, kind of like how we did before" is rather confusing to someone possibly in the midst of post-natal depression).
The policy, which has echoes of the Victorian homes for fallen women, is an admission that Labour has failed to tackle the serial abuse of the benefits system by single teenage mothers.
Vowing not to ‘shy away from taking difficult decisions on tough social questions’, the Prime Minister admitted that the scandal of ‘children having children’ has gone unspoken for too long.
Again. Simple pimple. If you want to stop someone abusing something, you simply take it away full stop for those people. But I suppose when you miss out on the opportunity to impose the righteousness of The State on these girls, it doesn't quite have the same ring to it. After all, who is going to teach them how to be good citizens and vote Labour otherwise? And I wonder what becomes of the absentee fathers in all this? Hardly "gender equality" is it? Teenage boys free to go around getting girls drunk on Bacardi Breeezers, inseminating them behind a bush in the park and then disappearing into the night knowing it won't be them getting sent to the gulag. Sounds like party time for the fellas, if you ask me.
Groups of between ten and 100 teenage mothers will be housed in residential units with job clubs, creches and parenting classes.
They will be made to sign behaviour contracts and if they break the rules they will be thrown out and sent to facilities with a tougher regime.
I wonder what this could entail. What rules would these be? If the reason for them being here in solely that they've had a child and hoped to gain a free council house out of it, surely removing that option solves the problem. Evidently not. Are we looking at 8pm bedtimes and no talking between meals? And what are these parenting classes? Not all teenage mothers are bad mothers. And you can't help but worry about the unnecessary separation of mothers and babies over the breaking of a rule set in, what is in essence, a publicly funded boarding school with dodgy shower facilities.
The problem is that offering up an elaborate benefits package to people who haven't proved any kind of contribution is appealing to some (contribution could be any number of things: voluntary/charity work, helping out at a girl guides group, etc). Again, simply removing the generous benefits offered to those who put nothing physical or financial into the system would solve much of this and would get them thinking more about the "give" aspect of "give and take". (If my employers suggested I could get the same or better pay surfing the net all day, sooner or later I might think about taking them up on that. That's conclusive enough).
Despite the total epic fail of all this, I am heartened by the fact McSnot hasn't managed to follow through on any of the soundbites he's ever unleashed ("British jobs for British people"? "Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime"?).
Luckily, we've not got much more of this to come (Labour will be gone soon, and will tell us whilst in opposition - if they still exist - that they simply needed more time to implement this master plan), and whilst I don't expect the Tories to be much (if at all) better, I see the creep towards a total surveillance state being that tiny bit slower under their watch *.
I am almost smirking with astonishment at the total and deliberate misconprehension of the problem. It's the failure to understand that sometimes the removal of incentive, rather than the provision of after-the-event "deterrents" is the best way forward. And to me, this looks wholeheartedly backward, reminiscent of the places women giving birth out of wedlock were sent to 50 years ago.
Deliberate institutionalism. I wonder who will be next. Those who don't vote perhaps? (H.T. The Lone Voice for digging up the story).
* - May revise this later.
The Low Enjoyment Lifestyle - Scottish Style!
Dick Puddlecote has been writing some excellent stuff recently. Not least in highlighting this piece of class bullshit (aka. a "report") from Sheffield University (from the Telegraph article).
It's fairly safe to say that most "harmful drinkers" are likely to not be in work anyway (not in the private sector anyway). And if they're down to save £137 a year, how much are some of these people claiming in various incapacity allowances and whatnots? Secondly, those lighter drinkers who stand to save £11 a year are simply going to buy the supermarket's own baked beans in order to compensate. It's not a big deal. I reckon I could save £150 a year by buying Tesco Value products.
And another point that hasn't really been thought through at all, is that at least some of these people are going to have kids. So the heavy drinkers will end up spending child benefit on booze and then we'll get yet more rounds from the Righteous of "child poverty".
I am also a bit confused by the terminology too. What exactly is a "hazardous drinker"? Hazardous to whom? I can't help but think this has been worded deliberately poorly so as to confuse and alarm.
It's just another tax hike. Let's not pretend. If they were serious, they'd either make drinking illegal or bump the prices up by 500%.
Pretentious cunts!
It estimates that alcohol-related hospital admissions and deaths would be reduced by 3,600 per year and there would also be 1,100 fewer criminal offences. For a 50p threshold the respective figures are 8,900 and 4,200.
The report also recognises that even though consumption might fall with minimum pricing, overall spending by consumers would go up. At the 40p threshold, consumers would be spending 3.4 per cent more on drink.
It concludes that a moderate drinker could expect to spend £11 more per year, a hazardous drinker £58 more a year and a harmful drinker £137 more.
Meanwhile, the research predicts a minimum price will also lead to 30,000 fewer absence days from work a year.
It's fairly safe to say that most "harmful drinkers" are likely to not be in work anyway (not in the private sector anyway). And if they're down to save £137 a year, how much are some of these people claiming in various incapacity allowances and whatnots? Secondly, those lighter drinkers who stand to save £11 a year are simply going to buy the supermarket's own baked beans in order to compensate. It's not a big deal. I reckon I could save £150 a year by buying Tesco Value products.
And another point that hasn't really been thought through at all, is that at least some of these people are going to have kids. So the heavy drinkers will end up spending child benefit on booze and then we'll get yet more rounds from the Righteous of "child poverty".
I am also a bit confused by the terminology too. What exactly is a "hazardous drinker"? Hazardous to whom? I can't help but think this has been worded deliberately poorly so as to confuse and alarm.
It's just another tax hike. Let's not pretend. If they were serious, they'd either make drinking illegal or bump the prices up by 500%.
Pretentious cunts!
Gordon "Pill Popping Cyclops" Brown Lies His Bollocks Off on TV
Well everyone else has been posting this so I thought "why not".
McTool diverts brilliantly (well, not so brilliantly) away from jug eared wanker Andrew Marr's second question. Marr doesn't really pursue it as such, and those ain't painkillers the fat pant pissing wanker is taking!
Note the body language. McKnob has an aggressively inquisitive look on his face, but then puts his hand up to his mouth which is a telltale sign of the lies he senses he's going to have to tell. As it happens, he doesn't appear to lie outright, he just ducks a question before pretending he'd answered it (about his meds).
Fucking FAIL, Gordon. Still not fit for office. For a written transcript, see this link.
McTool diverts brilliantly (well, not so brilliantly) away from jug eared wanker Andrew Marr's second question. Marr doesn't really pursue it as such, and those ain't painkillers the fat pant pissing wanker is taking!
Note the body language. McKnob has an aggressively inquisitive look on his face, but then puts his hand up to his mouth which is a telltale sign of the lies he senses he's going to have to tell. As it happens, he doesn't appear to lie outright, he just ducks a question before pretending he'd answered it (about his meds).
Fucking FAIL, Gordon. Still not fit for office. For a written transcript, see this link.
EU Funding. Waste
More top draw socialism via Calling England and Old Holborn, comes this little bit of fun (read: despair).
It's a database of how the EU wastes your money. I suspect it's been made as difficult to use as possible, although simply selecting a country and a year will pull up results where relevant.
One of my favourites is this, from last year:
Fuck me! Spelling, people! Looks like this is newspeak for "Turks are being prepared for indoctrination".
All was mysteriously quiet on the Libya front in 2007/8. For Pakistan, I noticed a lot of entries labelled "confidential" for 2008. Whatever could it mean? A cool half a million Euros also goes to Nigeria under the confidential label. Not to mention three entries for funds given to Workers' Paradise Cuba with no disclosed purpose attached. I could toy with this database all evening but I'm running out of hair to pull out and I drank all my wine yesterday.
So what do we think? Care to share any others you found?
It's a database of how the EU wastes your money. I suspect it's been made as difficult to use as possible, although simply selecting a country and a year will pull up results where relevant.
One of my favourites is this, from last year:
In line with the communication strategy of teh ECD ; 1. Improve public knowledge and understanding of teh European Union 2. explain the process of accession and its implications for Turkey and built support for EU membership
Fuck me! Spelling, people! Looks like this is newspeak for "Turks are being prepared for indoctrination".
All was mysteriously quiet on the Libya front in 2007/8. For Pakistan, I noticed a lot of entries labelled "confidential" for 2008. Whatever could it mean? A cool half a million Euros also goes to Nigeria under the confidential label. Not to mention three entries for funds given to Workers' Paradise Cuba with no disclosed purpose attached. I could toy with this database all evening but I'm running out of hair to pull out and I drank all my wine yesterday.
So what do we think? Care to share any others you found?
Do You Have a Cunt in Your Street?
Whilst most of us still lucky enough to have jobs are being worked to death to pay the highest council taxes and mortgages of all time, some cunts are busying themselves grassing people up for "crimes" which would be fucking crimes if they weren't committed, if you know what I mean.
Some anal, undersexed, pointless, "why-don't-you-just-fuck-off-and-die" idiot, no doubt employed within the back offices of the bloated fucking public sector, has grassed up two women for babysitting each other's children whilst both were working part time.
What kind of person has this amount of time on their hands? How many of your ordinary folk on the street even knew of this law? Not many, if my informal pub-based survey of my friends is anything to go by. And it's no doubt entirely planned that way.
Could be a petty revenge attack by someone they knew (and had spent several hours trawling through a load of legislation), but if it transpired to be just some cunt working for the State who happened to know them both and their arrangements, it wouldn't surprise me one iota.
Some anal, undersexed, pointless, "why-don't-you-just-fuck-off-and-die" idiot, no doubt employed within the back offices of the bloated fucking public sector, has grassed up two women for babysitting each other's children whilst both were working part time.
This was because little-known rules say friends cannot gain a 'reward' by looking after a child for more than two hours outside the child's home without agreeing to a number of checks including one from the Criminal Records Bureau.
Although the mothers never paid each other, their job-sharing deal was judged to be a 'reward'. Campaigners fear thousands of working families could be innocently breaking the rules by relying on close friends for informal childcare.
What kind of person has this amount of time on their hands? How many of your ordinary folk on the street even knew of this law? Not many, if my informal pub-based survey of my friends is anything to go by. And it's no doubt entirely planned that way.
Could be a petty revenge attack by someone they knew (and had spent several hours trawling through a load of legislation), but if it transpired to be just some cunt working for the State who happened to know them both and their arrangements, it wouldn't surprise me one iota.
What Our Troops SHOULD Have Had. And What Our MPs Got
From the Telegraph:
Enough to make you totally and utterly fucking sick in the mouth, isn't it! And now the useless pant pissing wankers are making noises about "dealing with Iran" (i.e "sanctions" - H.T. Leg Iron). Just fucking leave it Labour, you couldn't win a fucking tombola!
£11,510,792 – total cost of second homes allowance claimed by MPs in 2007-08. Would pay for 38 Ridgeback armoured vehicles, costing £300,000 each
£25,411 – cost of private security patrols outside Soho home of Barbara Follett. Could have been spent on 13 pairs of ITTT night vision goggles at £1,900 each
£22,500 – dry rot treatment Margaret Moran claimed for home 100 miles from constituency. Would have bought 10 underslung grenade launchers worth £2,160 each
£9,000 – installation of Ikea kitchen at Gordon Brown’s Westminster flat. The same price as nine sets of £1,000 Osprey full body armour
£8,865 – price of 40in Bang & Olufsen television claimed for by Sir Gerald Kaufman. Could have been spent on four SA80 A2 rifles at £1,800 each
£2,225 – amount claimed on a 'corner group’ sofa by Bob Ainsworth. Would have bought 14 Hawke long-range binoculars, which cost £150 a pair
£2,115 – amount claimed by Douglas Hogg to clear the moat at his country home. More than the cost of a single £1,790 MINIMI machine gun
£1,645 – cost of 'Stockholm’ floating duck house bought by Sir Peter Viggers. Could have bought 23 pairs of ESS ballistic sunglasses
£598 – servicing of ride-on lawnmower claimed by Alan Duncan. Would have paid for 11 Mk 6 Kevlar helmets
£480 – amount spent on 22 silk cushions by Keith Vaz. Could have been spent on three pairs of LOWA Desert combat boots
Enough to make you totally and utterly fucking sick in the mouth, isn't it! And now the useless pant pissing wankers are making noises about "dealing with Iran" (i.e "sanctions" - H.T. Leg Iron). Just fucking leave it Labour, you couldn't win a fucking tombola!
Global Gordon Knows...
A brilliant "I need my fucking pills and I need 'em now!" moment from Global Gordon, the snot gobbling, pant pissing, bed wetting, billy-fucking-no-mates-even-obumma-thinks-I'm-a-cunt excuse for a Prime Mentalist:
Bollock Obumma gave him about 3 minutes of his time, and even then it took all week to get that. When Obumma doesn't have any time for you, you know you're a cunt, judging by the people he does hang out with.
"I think you guys should start to understand how international meetings work."
Bollock Obumma gave him about 3 minutes of his time, and even then it took all week to get that. When Obumma doesn't have any time for you, you know you're a cunt, judging by the people he does hang out with.
In Spite?
What is going on in Doncaster indeed. Here's the original article from the Daily Express.
And here is a quote from the Daniel1979 blog, mentioned in the first link above:
Could it possibly be that Doncaster has a new mayor, someone who is upsetting the political classes and making them feel a little less perky and comfortable? Perhaps they don't like him cutting his own salary (as a reflection upon those who want to bloat theirs further), and perhaps they don't like the fact he has no wish to indoctrinate. He's rocking the boat.
You decide what you think of that.
And here is a quote from the Daniel1979 blog, mentioned in the first link above:
Doncaster has a Mayor, in fact a recently elected Mayor. His name is Peter Davies and he is an English Democrat, and he has sent shockwaves through the local community (and some national news outlets) when he was elected he immediately cut the Mayors salary from £73,000 to £30,000 and closed the Council’s own newspaper for peddling propaganda courtesy of the taxpayer. He pressed on and is seeking to cut the number of councillors from 63 to 21 in an effort to save a further £800,000. He has axed many of the Mayor’s other perks, including the chauffeur.
He has withdrawn Doncaster from the Local Government Association and the Local Government Information unit saving a further £200,000 and then made the following, almost legendary comment:
"Doncaster is in for some serious untwinning. We are twinned with probably nine other cities around the world and they are just for people to fly off and have a binge at the council’s expense".
Could it possibly be that Doncaster has a new mayor, someone who is upsetting the political classes and making them feel a little less perky and comfortable? Perhaps they don't like him cutting his own salary (as a reflection upon those who want to bloat theirs further), and perhaps they don't like the fact he has no wish to indoctrinate. He's rocking the boat.
You decide what you think of that.
Think About It
I mean really think about it. How wrong was Powell? Have multiculturalism and mass immigration worked? And who exactly has won and lost because of it?
That will be all.
Now This is What a Call a Study!
Well fuck me sideways with a rancid old tool!
Have you seen this load of shit?
Is there also a strong predictor that humans who have close contact with British hospitals are also more likely to get MRSA? Or could it be that people like pets, therefore thou shalt not be allowed to have one? A bit like smoking, drinking and being a fat fucker...
And THIRTY FIVE homes???? They're taking a study seriously that used a poxy 35 homes! Stick a couple of zeroes on that and you might have a leg to fucking stand on. And to cap it off, they found the bacteria on surfaces where virtually ALL bacteria lives! What the pissing piss are we meant to learn from this? It's fake science for knobheads.
Shit a fucking brick! I'm off to pour myself a scotch and watch re-runs of The Sweeney!
Have you seen this load of shit?
Animals who have close contact with humans pick up the superbug and then leave traces of it around the home where other people can be infected.
A study of homes by researchers at the Center for Hygiene and Health in Home and Community at Simmons College in Boston, found MRSA in nearly half of the 35 residences they sampled, mostly on wet surfaces like baths, sinks and tap handles.
The study concluded: “The presence of a cat in the home was found to be a strong predictor for the isolation of MRSA.”
Is there also a strong predictor that humans who have close contact with British hospitals are also more likely to get MRSA? Or could it be that people like pets, therefore thou shalt not be allowed to have one? A bit like smoking, drinking and being a fat fucker...
And THIRTY FIVE homes???? They're taking a study seriously that used a poxy 35 homes! Stick a couple of zeroes on that and you might have a leg to fucking stand on. And to cap it off, they found the bacteria on surfaces where virtually ALL bacteria lives! What the pissing piss are we meant to learn from this? It's fake science for knobheads.
Shit a fucking brick! I'm off to pour myself a scotch and watch re-runs of The Sweeney!
Gordon Brown is Fucking Pointless
Image by David Forward
Gordon Brown is a fat useless lump of lard. I wonder how long it'll be after he gets booted at the next election before he commits suicide (I'm serious here, the man is a nut job!).
You fat cunt, McShit!
Politics and Policing Are One and the Same
I fucking hate how the police are both being used by The Righteous so willingly, and allow themselves to become The Righteous whenever it bloody well bollocking suits them.
Take a look at this article. Then, once you're done, take a look at this one. The real moneyshot is the final quote of the second article (but please make sure you read what comes before it).
The police fucking "service" are ultimately run by self serving cunts. Still, I suppose not getting those calls from a law abiding family being literally bullied to death gives them plenty more time to do what they were fucking created for - booking and prosecuting motorists of course!
The police are run by fucking pigs. Period.
My condolances and best wishes to relatives of, and those who knew Fiona and Francecca Pilkington. Society will bite back one day, and when they do, somebody, somewhere in the upper echelons of both politics and policing is going to get fucking lynched. I promise.
Take a look at this article. Then, once you're done, take a look at this one. The real moneyshot is the final quote of the second article (but please make sure you read what comes before it).
The police fucking "service" are ultimately run by self serving cunts. Still, I suppose not getting those calls from a law abiding family being literally bullied to death gives them plenty more time to do what they were fucking created for - booking and prosecuting motorists of course!
The police are run by fucking pigs. Period.
My condolances and best wishes to relatives of, and those who knew Fiona and Francecca Pilkington. Society will bite back one day, and when they do, somebody, somewhere in the upper echelons of both politics and policing is going to get fucking lynched. I promise.
A Home Truth
I've been reading this article in the Daily Mail. After reading it (and most of my vains exploding with rage at pointless cunts like McShit and Bob the Knob in the meantime), I found this in the comments posted by someone called Heather Rowsell (the origin of the below words in unknown):
How true it is. But how long before Britain wakes up? I am sure that it will. But for now I despair.
It is the soldier, not the reporter,
Who has given us Freedom of the press.
It is the soldier, not the poet,
Who has given us Freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the campus organiser,
Who has given us the
Freedom to demonstrate.
It is the soldier, who serves beneath the Flag,
Who salutes the Flag.
Whose coffin is draped in the Flag.
Who allows the protester to burn the Flag.
It is the soldier, not the politician,
who has given his blood, his body, his life.
How true it is. But how long before Britain wakes up? I am sure that it will. But for now I despair.
Minitrue on Smoking
Picked up on this article from Dick Puddlecote, in reference to the lying cunts at the BBC aiding some more Leftist propagandising (doing as they're fucking told by BB, basically).
Do read both versions. Dick Puddlecote's offers some proper fucking analysis!
Fuck the fuck off, you control freak, lying, corrupt, licence extorting, "bend over a desk and take one up the fucking jacksie off your political masters" wankers!
BBC are shitters!
Coming Back to England...
I like holidays. I hate coming home. But it's not my home and job I hate coming back to, it's the filthy fucking chav scum that festers within virtually every town in England. Cunts with pierced ears and novelty tattoos that think they're fucking 'ard because someone spent a few minutes dragging a needle through their thick fucking skins writing something in Japanese that they don't fucking understand. No work history and ASBOs for assaulting kids 10 years younger than them because real men would kick the fucking crap out of them.
Stupid bitches with scraped back hair, five fucking kids by about twenty five different fathers, half of whom have either been deported or sent to prison. Ugly as fuck, voices ravaged by nightly booze and forty fucking fags a day paid for by the State.
Fat cunts in Spurs away shirts stretched over the bellies that metabolism forgot. Wearing sandals and baggy shorts with half a million fucking pockets in them just to load up with whisky miniatures and lighters. Not to mention the odd shoplifted Mars bar. Dicks.
In the Czech Republic, even the tramps speak second and third languages. Our fucking lowlifes can't even speak English! In Europe, people look after their stuff. Old cars galore - because they don't blow twelve fucking grand on a new one just to outdo their neighbours. They save that money and go out to cafes for a chat - to socialise pleasantly. They go around and about and get to know their own countries. They have good manners. Our people, especially the middle classers, are driven by being able to tell Mrs. Miggins over the fucking fence that they spent 2 more days in a 5 star in Hawaii on fucking credit than she did.
People here are being turned into cunts. Cunts of varying accents and dress sense, but cunts all the same. All together, but separate.
Don't get me wrong. It's certainly not all Brits (me and 2 other people here have fucking brains). But some people are so fucking hypnotised by shit like Eastenders they have simply turned into them. They idolise rappers, but chastise doctors and midwives struggling to deliver their twelfth and thirteenth fucking babies under the monstrous strain placed on them by soppy graduate cunts that pass as NHS "managers" (none of whom have any medical experience). Only to claim hundreds of pounds a month in benefits because the government said it's fucking OK with us!
We are rapidly becoming the least educated nation in Europe, and I'd be willing to fucking bet it's all deliberate. Give people loads of money, keep the fuckers busy spending it on fucking crap and then they might not notice their country (and them) are being turned into shitty fucking cuntholes that nobody in their right minds would piss on if alight.
Well I HAVE noticed. And you, "Establishment", aren't going to fucking get away with it.
Be warned, politicians. I'm not the only one. Just be fucking warned...
Yasmin Alibhai-Brown is a Cunt
Cracking quote, from this piece of shit on The Independent:
In high-migrant areas, extra funds are urgently needed to ease pressure on other inhabitants. Our least productive districts are those with static populations, but the most deprived should not pay for the indisputable economic benefits of immigration.
What "indisputable economic benefits of immigration" means is cheap au-pairs from Latvia, cheap (illegal) cleaners from Tonga, cheap Polish builders and cheap Romanian housekeepers - all working for The Establishment of course. Either way, it's cheap. That's what matters. Cheap. Just like the souls of our corrupt, money grabbing, piss-it-up-the-fucking-wall-like-a-good-un, champagne swilling, shit for brains fuckers for politicians.
And where are the "economic benefits" if you're then going to use all this fictional money to prop up those who were already here? It's bollocks. Cunt.
And presumably, the "extra funds" she mentions are simply a bribe to shut the locals the fuck up. Also, if all this immigration is bringing in so much money, why do you talk of people (the most deprived) paying for it?
Just fuck the fuck off, woman. Back up your claims and come the fuck back with something factual.
Two Thousand and Ten
The one eyed, pant pissing, snot gobbling, pill popping, bed wetting, English hating, soldier disrespecting, prejudiced, socialist CUNT!
How to Be a Socialist
How to be a socialist in 2009 without actually ending up piss poor and starving to death.
A union baron and his cronies tucked into a banquet costing about £100 a head after calling for a crackdown on the super-rich at the TUC annual conference.
Derek Simpson, leader of the giant Unite union, and his colleagues enjoyed a lavish dinner that included veal, venison and Cumbrian beef at one of Liverpool’s top restaurants.
The party of ten, who took the best table in the restaurant in the city’s gentrified Hope Street quarter, started with cocktails before washing down their meal with wines costing up to £40.
Mr Simpson himself quaffed a fine red. Earlier in the week, Mr Simpson, 64, a well-known critic of ‘fat-cat spivs’ and bankers’ bonuses – despite himself earning about £100,000 a year – led calls at the TUC rally for new help for hard-pressed working families.
He said: ‘Over the years, working families have funded tax concessions for big business and the super-rich. Now it’s payback time.’
He's a cunt. And while Unite pays all his expenses for him, such as £400-a-night and £220-a-night hotel rooms, I shouldn't think "taxing the rich" is likely to bother him all that much. But then again, if he's as for the working classes as that snot gobbling, pant pissing, unelected, one eyed, pill popping, insane cunt of a Prime Minister is, it won't be the super rich that suffer as he says.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
